DUCATI Apollo - A Bike much Ahead of its Time

I guess not many have heard about it. Ducati to the current generation and my generation (Generation X) are symbolised with red or yellow super sports bikes with the distinguished front lights. But in the early 6os, Fabio Taglioni made a 1260cc V four which is all about the APOLLO. Only 2 of such engines were built, one of which is now on display at Ducati's factory museum in Bologna. No one knows about the second. Maybe because only 2 were made, the Apollo today enjoys a mythical reputation like the comic hero Phantom, revered and with awe. At that time, 85% Ducatis were sold in U.S. The Ducati U.S wing, lead by Joe Berliner was rich in finance and it wanted to make an impact in the cruiser segment, U.S favorite motorcycle segment. Of course Harley Davidson was a big star already and Ducati wanted to take the HD brand head on. Discussions went on with Ducati Italy and they agreed that Ducati U.S will provide the financial aid to its parent corporation in Italy in lieu of that U.S would be allowed to dictate the prototype’s specifications. The stipulation was that the bike should have an engine bigger than anything in Harley's range, which was then topped by the 1215cc FL-series models. The remainder of the technical specifications was left to Taglioni, who decided on a 90-degree V-four.
So what was the engine all about? The V4 had a perfect primary balance that negated a counter balancer, even with 180-degree crank throws (each pair of pistons rising and falling together) and separate, differentially finned air-cooled cylinders. The two valves per cylinder were operated via pushrods and rockers with screw-type adjusters, while the horizontally split wet-sump engine featured a single crank running in a central support, with each pair of con-rods sharing a single caged roller-bearing big end. Taglioni considered liquid-cooling but rejected it due to complications and bulk, and although shaft drive was suggested by Berliner, Taglioni didn’t incorporate it as he didn’t find the shaft drive trust worthy, so he went for a duplex final-drive chain. With the cylinders of the mighty 1256cc engine measuring 84.5mm x 56.0mm, the Apollo's V-four motor was the most oversquare design Taglioni had ever produced for Ducati. It was installed as a stressed member in a beefy open-cradle frame with a central box-section downtube between the front two cylinders. With specially developed Ceriani suspension, the Apollo's handling was certain to outperform Harley, which had only recently discovered rear suspension. The full-width 220mm single-leading-shoe front and rear drum brakes didn't promise much and what lead to it? We will see...
Anyway, an electric starter similar to the one used on a Fiat TV1100 was also featured. A massive generator was fitted in order to cope with the additional load imposed by sirens, lights and radios. Relatively compact, the alloy V-four engine allowed the Apollo to favorably compare with its Harley rival, weighing 596 pounds dry with a 61.2-inch wheelbase vs. the American V-twin's 62.2-inch stance and 640-pound weight. Ducati test rider Franco Farne was the first to ‘test’ it and he said "it handles like a truck,". “Perfect” said Berliner as this was strictly ‘The American Way’, and the Ducati Berliner 1260 Apollo, as the bike was officially known, was unofficially born. The engine had a helluva straight-line performance, delivering a claimed 100 horsepower at 7000 rpm (vs. 55 hp for the Harley) and good for a top speed in excess of 120 mph. Pretty impressive for its day. But also damning, for its meaty performance was the Apollo's primary downfall, a fact confirmed by Ducati tester Giancarlo "Fuzzi" Librenti, who was the first to suffer the heart-stopping experience of having the specially made 16-inch rear tire come apart at high speed on the autostrada.
The agreement called for Ducati to construct two prototypes and two spare engines. The first of these, painted in ritzy metallic gold and sporting a huge cowboy saddle fitted with a chrome grab handle, was handed over to the Americans in a formal ceremony in March, '64. Ape-hanger handlebars, deeply valanced fenders and fat whitewalls completed the Italo-American styling, which made the Apollo look much bigger and bulkier than it really was. The second prototype looked more tasteful, with leaner fenders, altered side covers, and a more discreet black-and-silver paint job--albeit still with the Wild West seat. While testing proved the Apollo had plenty of power, it was quickly discovered that Librenti's experience was not an isolated incident. The V-four, combined with the bike's heft was too much for the 16-inch tires, even after power had been reduced to approximately 80 hp. Alarming stories of riders nearly killed in high-speed testing filtered back to Bologna. The solution was to detune the twin-carb version of the engine further (to 65 hp), adequate to meet police performance specs and still superior to the Harley, thanks to the V-four Ducati's lighter weight. This finally cured the tire-disintegration problems. But this effectively ruled out selling the Apollo as a luxury sport-tourer because its power-to-weight ratio was now inferior to the BMW and British twins that would have been its import rivals in the U.S. market. Joe Berliner was so confident in the bike's potential that he'd already begun marketing the Apollo in the States, and printed a brochure quoting $1500 for the touring version and $1800 for the Sport--substantially more than its European twin-cylinder competition and double the cost of the equivalent Harley. At that price, the Ducati would have had to boast an additional edge in performance to justify the extra cost, but in detuned form it could not.
With the V-four set up to deliver the right kind of power to meet the marketplace demands, it would be lethal until tire technology could catch up. This situation provided the perfect opportunity for the bureaucrats in Rome to kill off a project they'd never had faith in and only agreed due to the U.S wing pressure. Citing the fact that the model was now suitable only for the specialist police market, the bureaucrats claimed sales would be insufficient to justify the immense tooling costs involved in gearing up for production. Berliner, who had already successfully demonstrated the Apollo to selected police chiefs, was appalled. He had promised that production of the reduced-power version would commence in '65, yet now the whole project seemed in danger of collapse. So it proved. Further funding for the Apollo was withdrawn, and Montano was reluctantly forced to cancel the project early in '65, leaving the second of the two prototypes constructed to head straight back from Daytona into the Berliner warehouse in New Jersey, where it remained for the next two decades in a corner of the storeroom--a sad reminder of a motorcycle killed by a mixture of government infighting and its own advanced specification. The Apollo was simply too much, too soon. As an indication of how proud he was of the design, though, the spare engine sat on display in Taglioni's office for 20 years until his retirement, a silent testament to his versatility and farsightedness.
However, the memory of the Apollo lingered on, for as a prophetic article in Italy's Motociclismo magazine suggested when the existence of the Apollo was first revealed in '63, one half of the engine would provide a superb basis for a range of 90-degree V-twin models. Five years after the project's demise, Taglioni proved the worth of that assertion when he designed Ducati's first ohc, 750cc V-twin, closely inspired by the Apollo's architecture. In '86 Hiroaki Iwashita acquired the Daytona show bike, the second of the two Apollos built, Iwashita bought the Apollo for $17,000, big money back then in 1984 as top of the line Harleys presently cost that much. The bike was secreted to his private collection in Japan until '95, when he displayed it at a vintage bike show in Tokyo. This alerted Ducati to the bike's existence, and when the factory museum was established at the end of '96, it became a centerpiece exhibit. What a bike, it is most assuredly a million-dollar motorcycle in 2007. At just 29.5 inches high, the plush seat is low enough to throw a leg over easily. Bike journalist Alan Cathcart got to ride the Ducati Berliner Apollo for Motorcyclist magazine. ‘Once astride the Apollo, you're immediately surprised at how low slung and slim it feels. The high, pullback handlebar is very ’60s, and combined with the well-placed footpegs, delivers surprisingly comfy ergos. Just chill out and cruise,’ says Cathcart.
‘The engine sounds like an American V8 rather than an Italian four, and the Apollo’s exhaust note is quite loud and very unlike that of any Honda V4. I was impressed with how smoothly the Apollo took off from rest, even with the clutch slipping slightly, though upshifting through the gears brought the Apollo's age to light. Once securely in gear, the Apollo thrusts forward eagerly with a long-legged feel, especially in the intermediate gears’ says Cathcart. He continues 'Compared with a pre-Isoelastic British twin or any Harley ever made, the Apollo is a sewing machine to a concrete mixer in terms of vibration and riding comfort, with only a BMW Boxer of the era delivering anything close to the same smoothness. Out of respect for the bike's rarity, and the lack of any spares, I didn't rev it out. But even at a higher rpm the same unruffled, lazy-feeling response we came to take for granted a decade later on any V-twin bearing the Ducati badge is evident on the Apollo.' 'At a time when there were no four-cylinder motorcycles of any type on the market, the Apollo would have established a standard of performance and rider comfort that, even a decade later, would set the benchmark for the Japanese. Truly, this was a bike ahead of its time,’ concludes Cathcart.

Those few who have ridden it says that “the four Dell'Orto carbs the Apollo wears (which indicate that this bike has the most powerful state of tune, not the restricted twin-carb spec) scorn the choke, but on a warm day the motor catches quickly, then settles down to a fast idle with an unmistakable cadence more akin to an American V-eight than an Italian four. The Apollo's exhaust note is totally unique, unlike any V-four Honda, and quite loud, too; the slender twin silencers don't have a lot of packing, and the result has the same trademark growl as a later desmo V-twin, only busier-sounding and higher-pitched. Once securely in gear, the Apollo thrusts forward eagerly with a long-legged feel, especially in the intermediate gears; there's great response from the light-action throttle, and frankly there's no way this engine feels like a child of the '60s. Top gear (fifth--at a time when practically all other bikes had only four-speed boxes) feels like overdrive and would have been ideal for freeway cruising. There's enough midrange to use the bottom four ratios as a means of getting into top gear and leaving it there, surfing the waves of torque available at almost any rev. Impressive. Compared with a British twin or any Harley ever made, the Apollo is a sewing machine to a concrete mixer in terms of vibration and riding comfort, with only a BMW Boxer of the era delivering anything close to the same smoothness. Even at a higher rpm the same unruffled, lazy-feeling response came to take for granted a decade later on any V-twin bearing the Ducati badge is evident on the Apollo." If it wasn’t focused on the police market, with its insistence on 16-inch rubber, and had instead conceived the Apollo as the world's first four-cylinder sportbike with tires and handling to match, even at the higher price the Italian V-four would have dictated, the U.S. market--and those in Europe wouldn't have had to wait another 10 years for Kawasaki to do the job properly with the arrival of the Z-1.
The Ducati Apollo was one of the great missed opportunities of world biking.
Source of photos, information and added web links for the Ducati Apollo – Ducati History, Ducati, Motorcycle Classics, Motorcyclist Online, Wiki.
Specifications –
Engine - 1,257 cc, 4 cylinder 90° V configuration
Bore and Stroke & Compression ratio - 84.5 mm x 56 mm & 8:1
Timing system - Rocker arm and push rod overhead valve gear
Lubrication - Forced wet sump
Cooling system & Carburetor – Air & 4 Dellorto TT 24 carburetors
Transmission & Drive - Four speed gearbox& Primary reduction by gears, Final by Chain
Frame - Tubular and box section frame
Suspensions - Front telescopic forks & Swinging arm rear suspension with twin shocks
Brakes - Drum brakes
Tyres - 5.00 x 16”
Weight – 270 kgs

HARLEY DAVIDSON VR 1000 - The Ore of the Revolution

We all have heard and seen the only Harley-Davidson Superbike which never took off from the factory. Although the current portfolio and in general, HD has majorly imaged itself as a tourer-cruiser brand, occasionally HD deviates itself from their image to give us some very definite products like the XR TT750 which was the best track racing bike of its times. But then again, they are into projects like the NOVA (the most read post in this blog) which would have seen a sea change in the history of motorcycling and not just in HD history, but then… A very similar story follows for the VR 1000 Superbike, a bike with so much promise but which never got to see the road.
Back in 1988, two gentlemen working for HD dreamt about the ultimate Superbike that HD can offer to the then non suspecting world. They were Mark Tuttle, the then VP of Engineering and designer Mark Miller. They knew that have something very big in their kitty. Of course it had to be, and it was in the form of a liquid-cooled, fuel injected V-twin which will dominate SBK racing. In 1989, these gentlemen bought their half done product to Roush Racing to complete the engine design phase. Another gentleman, Steve Scheibe, designer joined the team and he started working on the main part of the heart of the VR 1000, the cylinder heads and the machine's fuel injection system. Mike Eatough who specializes in GP chassis designs joined the team for the chassis design and it is said that he designed as widely believed, one of the best Superbike chassis ever. But then Steve left Roush and they got the project back to the HD factory and time took its toll and finally what started out in 1988, in 1993, the VR 1000 took its first road test in Gratten Raceway, in Michigan. And finally went into official racing by 1996.
So what went wrong? You see, the bike was envisaged in 1988 and the engine specifications were designed with that time period in mind. When it was released finally in 1996, almost a decade later, other firms have improved by leaps and bounds, especially DUCATI with their mesmerizing 888. With almost 150bhp power, the VR 1000 would have exploded in the early 90s, but in 1996, they fell short. Moreover, the Jap completion took a beating from Ducati, so they all went back to their drawing boards in the early 90s and unleashed a range of new killer products from the stable to match Ducati and HD was stuck in time zone.
Officially, the bike made its debut in 1994, I mean for the public at the Daytona 200. The debut bike had the HD racing genes like the XR TT750 with the dual black and orange paint (black on left side and orange on the right side) with Wilwood brakes, Ohlins for front suspension and Penske forks on the rear. The racing team comprised of Miguel DuHamel and Fritz Kling, two men who had already made their mark in the racing circuit. They started out with Miguel but it was evident the VR 1000 was not ready for the real field, it could perform for short laps but certainly not for the track which would require up to an hour of constant performance. Miguel was not able to finish the race on the very first official race and if running way back was not a problem enough, there was a loud explosion. It was found that there were electrical problems and loose pieces inside the engine, obviously which has fallen off from its bearings. So even after 8 years of its conception, the VR 1000 was not ready.
Notwithstanding the initial hiccups which happen to almost all the companies, Miguel was actually able to deliver the goods at many races and another incident occurred in Mid-Ohio where he was leading the race till the shift lever fell off the bike! It also belied some pundits when it managed a very good run at Brainerd as pundits believed it won’t be able to sustain a mile long front straight. In 1995, Miguel left HD and in came Chris Carr, dirt track ace rider and he took the VR 1000 to the one and only pole in the bike’s name at Pornoma. In 1996, the VR 1000 was quite consistent throughout the season. Not that it was not with credits but somehow lady luck deserted it quite often than not. Tom Wilson won the Mid-Ohio Superbike race on the VR 1000 and crossed the finish line first only to be shown not the chequered flag, but the red one to stop the race put the race back a lap, Wilson was not lucky the second time. Again at Sears Point, Carr and Wilson finished second and third in that race and again it was red-flagged and re-started. On the re-race, they finished 4th and 5th. Also of course there was some technological hiccups. Like in the Sears Point, during the re-race, they had some clutch problems and once Pascal Picotte led the Daytona 200 for a few laps before slow pit stops doomed him to a poor finish.
After Wilson and Carr, came Scott Russell, former World Superbike champion and Daytona winner, but Russell had never raced a Twin and HD would have probably benifitted more if they spent the money on R & D instead of getting these famed racers on board. After all how much can a racer do if the engine still needs to be worked upon?
So why does and is so much being written about a bike which was not really a success? There is something more than just the bike. HD knew that with little work, they have a deadly product in hand and it is said that for that purpose, all the top notches were vying for power. If they couldn’t, they would try killing the project. All this in house struggles were really sidelining the product. Steve Scheibe working on the engine had a fall-out with VP of Engineering Earl Werner and Erik Buell. The management didn’t see enough reason as to why spend so much on a product when they have an established cruiser and tourer line up? It was difficult for them to comprehend that to compete with the Jap 4 and Ducati, Hd had to shell out millions on R & D. At times, they were even unwilling to continue the race circuit. And somehow the management was not at all in favour of Steve Schiebe. And without Steve, the VR 1000 just can’t go ahead. See, HD didn’t have a racing record as per se, this was new, so obviously a lot of money has to go into the prototype turning into final product building stage, but the management of HD was just happy selling the lifestyle bikes and didn’t want to scratch their heads all over.
Of course, all these lead to serious time lapse and during this period the other companies went ahead in leaps and bounds. Soon after, Steve left and John Baker filled his shoes. And the project stalled here. Later Baker in 2001 fuelled his thoughts that the VR might be back and even Eric Buell has admitted that a sportbike utilizing Harley Davidson's VR1000 engine is in development but in 2002 HD simply said ‘No’ to the race season and have no plans as of now to get back to road racing..
But it could have been so much different. In the 80s, when the XR750 was dominating the dirt race tracks, HONDA was nowhere in the picture. But they wanted to make an impact and later, we all know it did. How? Simple, get the best riders, get the best tuners and soon after, they started winning, so all it took was a lot of money. That’s it. Honda didn't care how much it cost, they simply yearned to win and they did. HD top management probably never really wanted to win or was just not convinced in spending. Just 50 of them were built with a listed price of $49,490 and some are even now available on ebay and I saw a listing on olx. Well, to bring your smile back, let me tell you, the hugely successful V-Rod has been based on the VR 1000! In the hindsight, what could have been… well, we will never know… at least for now.
Read a track test on the VR 1000 in a Motorcycle.com post. Lots of VR 1000 links here.
Source of some photos – Motorcycle Museum, Source of racing photos- Andrew Rosenthal
Specs
Engine - 1000cc, Four stroke, 60° V-Twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Bore x Stroke & Compression Ratio - 98 x 66 mm & 11.6:1
Induction & Ignition / Starting - Weber EFI &Electronic / electric
Max Power - 135 hp @ 10000 rpm
Clutch & Transmission / Drive- Dry Multi-disc & 5 Speed / chain
Frame - Aluminium 2 Spar parameter
Front & Rear Tyre - 120/70 ZR17 & 170/70 ZR17
Wet-Weight & Fuel Capacity -176 kg & 17 Litres brakes,

Goldammer ExperiMental with a 250cc rocket

Photo credit Motorcycle USA where mentioned in the photo itself, others are from Goldammer website.
Usually a 250cc single doesn't really excite many a people and you probably wont give a second glance to it. Now if that 250cc happens to be a 2 stroker, okay, there may be a few raised eyebrows being a screamer.
Now add the fact that it was on the Salts for a drag race. And again add to that it was against a Vincent. Now just add that this particular bike is designedby Roger Goldammer. See, now you stood up! So you see even a single 250cc can make you sit up!
This is the ExperiMental. And yes, Goldammer has never done the ordinary but he turns ordinary into something beyond extraordinary just as he did in the stunning Nortorious, the supercharged single cafĂ© racer. Although custom builders are immediately associated with long chromed frames and a V-Twin engine and of course it hold true for 99% of builders (Non-Japanese, since we know what they are really capable of) or lets say, 99% of American Custom builders, that 1% is made by genius like Roger who hails from Canada. It’s just that Roger Goldammer doesn’t build commissioned bikes anymore. He now designs customs for himself, as he wants to his own specifications and standards. His finances come through the sales of his parts line.
If you have gone through an earlier post on Matt Hotch’s Vincent Chopper, you must have read that the ExperiMental was the bike Roger had built for a TV episode of Discovery channel Biker Build-Off against Matt’s Vincent. In the salts, the ExperiMental at 128.774 mph (207 .21 kmph) edged out the Vincent at 99.728 mph (160.49 kmph). Imagine a 250 single doing 200+ and a 40s Vincent doing 160!!!!
That he won the build-off and the subsequent race in Bonneville is secondary. What we really need to praise here is that if there are no set limitations, what kind of out-of-the-box- thinking goes into the minds of a genius? I mean, just think about it, who would have thought that a 250cc engine can ever get this kind of an attention?
If you are still thinking of those figures, for the record, the ExperiMental managed to do a top speed of 212 kmph with a two-way average speed of 204.688kmph at breaking the previous record of 174kmph in the 250 M-G class, of course in the Bonneville Salt Flats.
Roger has made a habit of winning Championships starting for his twin victory at AMD at 2004 and again in 2005. His custom bikes features heavily modified engines and his specialty definitely seems to be the single cylinder. The ExperiMental was a 2007 bike and that year too, he won the 1st Place at AMD World Championship 2007 Metric Class. What really is more interesting about the engine is that it is a two-stroke BRC 250cc super kart motor and the frame’s donor is the CR 250 which is actually a dirt bike. The frame is heavily modified and fitted with dual KRC supercart motors. So what went into the ExperiMental? A brand new Honda CR250R, which was completely stripped out. The dirt bike’s frame was chopped from the centre. It was then widened to accommodate the custom front end, you know, a new engine with modded radiators. Keep looking at the pictures, you can relate to the build process. The down tube and the lower frame rails were cut and modified to give the bike a lower and longer attitude. Look at the photo of the ExperiMental and the original CR250 side by side.

About the engine, these 250cc engines are used in go-karting and this engine was designed by Rotax/ Aprilia and developed by BRC. Actually this engine is used in the premier go-kart league, the Superkart series and as hard it is to believe, this engine makes 91bhp, thanks to the motor which has its cylinders placed one behind the other with two counter rotating crankshafts. The two crankshafts are geared together. It also features an electric water pump. You see the curved radiators, they are from KTM and that shape was given by using a wooden jig. The expansion chambers had to be fabricated but some portions came from a Superkart exhaust with the same kind of specifications. Look at the sexy classy front end. It features a girder style front made from aircraft aerostream tubing with a Penske shock unit while the rear suspension is from Fox racing. Other important features include the brakes which are made of ceramic/ aluminum composite material and those wheels. The wheels are 19 inch upfront and 18 inch at the rear and are made in ultra lightweight carbon fiber.
Whatever gave Roger the idea or no matter who gave him the idea, but what is ExperiMental is, is a divine creation of work from the mind of a genius, that long and low geometry, with a bare minimum bodywork makes it very unique. I strongly doubt anyone except Roger will try for anything so radical as the ExperiMental. Well, of course, you can have it. You see, Roger has given up building customs for clients and he needs money to experiment on bikes like these. He said he has a few bills to pay and as such as he has all the bikes he has built till now, so he is selling off the Nortorious and the Experimental (and now his website lists even the 'Trouble' for sale) at a little over $127,000 and $116,000 respectively, I mean that’s the asking price, so…

P.S

__________________________________
This blog is not affilated with any official websites or blogs. It will not feature any paid advertisements. It is not meant for official records. It is a personal hobby and all the contents and photos are downloaded or modified from free internet content. Credit goes to the original posters and the original posters have been credited wherever applicable.
___________________________________
For any complaints and suggestions, please mail at diesel@aol. in (For security purpose, there is a gap between 'aol' and 'in'. Please remove the gap when writing the address. Thanks)